|
January
11, 2010

| In
This Newsletter |
| Retail
Employment In Georgia |
| Ad
Valorem Inventory Tax |
| Sales
Tax Holiday |
| Vendor's
Allowance |
| Retailers'
Costs, State's Income From Fees |
| Streamline
Sales Tax |
| Sunday
Sale of Alcohol |
I
sent this newsletter to the members of the Georgia General Assembly
today and wanted you to have a copy.
Dear Legislator:
With the economic challenges that have faced Georgia in the last
year, I think it is important that we step back and look at the
retail industry's footprint in Georgia. Did you know that retail
is one of the state's biggest industries? Not only do retailers
collect over $4 billion in state sales tax and pay millions in other
taxes to state and local governments, but they employ nearly 800,000
Georgians and pay more than $13.8 billion in wages annually. And
none of these numbers includes the cash and in-kind contributions
retailers make to civic and charitable organizations in communities
from Savannah to Rome, from Augusta to Columbus, and from Valdosta
to Atlanta.
The last eighteen months have been the worst years ever for Georgia's
retailers. We saw more store closings, from big stores like Goodys
to small ones like McDonough Feed and Seed in my own community,
hundreds of dark store fronts appeared across the state. An accompanying
result of the economic downturn was that State revenue also plummeted.
Georgia laws have not helped this, in fact, they have disadvantaged
the retail industry by making it less competitive with its neighbors
by sustain an inventory tax; by refusing to allow the off-premises
Sunday sale of alcohol; and by allowing e-commerce unfair advantages
over the state's brick and mortar stores.
So, before you go home this year please think about giving the state's
economic engine a tune-up, because "when retail works, Georgia
works.
John Heavener
President
Georgia Retail Association
“When
Retail Works, Georgia Works”
Retail Employment on Georgia
The retail industry today directly represents 788,975 jobs in Georgia;
accounting for 18.81 percent of the total employment in Georgia.
That's just about one in every five jobs.
Retail wages are competitive. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics
for 2009 the average retail manager earns $35.61 per hour; the average
first line retail supervisors earn 17.35 per hour; the average retail
buyer earns $29.25 per hour; the average sales counter clerk earns
$10.06 per hour and the average cashier $9.30 per hour.
The retail industry offers substantial employment opportunities.
Part-time and temporary work is plentiful ranging from small, independent
retailers to national and multinational retail chains. Solid store
experience can lead to an array of retail management and store support
career ladders. A college degree can afford direct entry into management
training programs and regional/corporate level career paths.
The retail trade industry is a dynamic field with diverse career
ladders, a wide range of employee benefits and on-the-job training
that is increasingly driven by high-end technology that requires
advanced skills. Employers recruit job candidates from community
colleges and universities and train incumbent workers to upgrade
their skills for career advancement.
Retail trade employers struggle to attract and retain the best and
brightest employees because of the misperception that jobs are low-wage
and lack growth potential. In reality, today's retail trade careers
are more than just cashier and sales associate positions; they encompass
information technology, marketing, communications, loss prevention,
finance and merchandise sourcing.
During the current economic environment, and for years to come,
job retention and creation in the retail industry are critical elements
of Georgia's economic health.
Ad Valorem Inventory Tax
Retailers pay a disproportionately high portion of the tax.
From a tax policy standpoint, taxes should be very broad based;
they should not single out any particular industry. Many industries
in Georgia are exempt from the inventory tax. These include most
manufacturers, automobile dealers, heavy equipment dealers and farm
equipment dealers. This leaves retailers to pay the lion's share
of the inventory tax. To impose such an onerous tax almost exclusively
on an industry that employs a large number of Georgia's citizens
is not sound tax policy.
The inventory tax makes Georgia anti-competitive. Georgia
is one of only ten states in the country that imposes an inventory
tax. None of the states that border Georgia impose an inventory
tax. Moreover, three of the other nine states are phasing out their
inventory tax (Indiana, Ohio and Rhode Island). Inventory taxes
are especially harmful to retail stores and others that have large
amounts of merchandise. They distort economic decisions because
they force companies to make business decisions based on minimizing
tax burdens, rather than economic activity. They create strong incentives
to move inventory (such as warehouses and shipping facilities) to
other states.
Georgia's inventory tax presents administrative nightmares.
The valuation of inventory is done at the county level. There is
no uniformity among the counties in how inventory is valued or how
auditors are compensated. To the contrary, there is wide variation
from county to county. This leads to significant taxpayer confusion.
Moreover, the ambiguities and inconsistencies in the interpretation
and administration of Georgia's inventory tax frequently results
in tax assessments that are overstated. This forces taxpayers to
choose between paying money they do not owe, and engaging in expensive,
time-consuming litigation to correct the assessment.
Frequent litigation is a sign of a bad tax. Taxes should be administered
and interpreted in a fair, consistent and unambiguous manner. The
Georgia inventory tax fails on all of these counts.
The ad Valorem inventory tax is one of Georgia's most unreasonable
taxes; one that discriminates retailers from other commercial enterprises
in the state. The tax requires retailers to pay a fee based on the
cost of its inventory. The fee a retailer is required to pay is
derived by multiplying the millage rate that your county charges
for your location by your inventory at 40% of its cost.
Some retailers are exempt from this onerous tax; these include automobile
dealers, heavy equipment dealers, and farm equipment dealers. Most
manufacturers in Georgia are also eligible for Freeport Tax Credits
that exempt the company from paying taxes on most if not all of
its inventory that they have created as long as it is sold within
a one year time period.
By eliminating the ad Valorem inventory tax the General Assembly
can help create a more even playing field for Georgia's retailers
vis-à-vis it neighboring states and other groups in Georgia
that have been given preferential treatment.
Some retailers have constructed warehouse facilities in nearby states
and could locate future facilities in Georgia if the ad Valorem
inventory tax was abolished.
Sales Tax Holiday Benefits Georgia
An Analysis of the Costs and Benefit of the Back to School Sales
Tax Holiday
Until now the arguments surrounding the Sales Tax Holidays have
been based primary on political instincts and personal observations.
However, new research shows that the temporary tax relief for essentials
such as inexpensive clothing, paper, and pencils is more than just
a popular break for strapped consumers. A study by The Washington
Economics Group (WEG) found that sales tax holidays enhance a state's
fiscal health.
With Georgia moving into one of the most austere budget years in
decades, lawmakers must wisely shepherd sharply limited revenues.
Some members of the Georgia General Assembly will surely call for
a hiatus in the Back to School Sales Tax Holiday and the Energy
STAR Holiday.
In October, 2009 the Georgia Association of Educators issued a news
release linking the Georgia's Back to School Sales Tax Holiday to
a revenue shortfall which, they claimed, in turn, caused teachers
to be furloughed as part of the state's budget cutting process.
This is not a new knee jerk reaction to the Back to School Sales
Tax Holiday. While nearly every legislator votes for the Back to
School Sales Tax Holiday bill (due to its popularity with voters),
some express reservations about the legislation.
While that study looked specifically at Florida, the conclusions
can be extrapolated for Georgia's Back to School Sales Tax Holiday
as well.
• The study performed by The Washington Economics Group found
that the Back to School Sales Tax Holiday has a positive economic
impact, increasing gross sales by about 8 percent for the month.
• Based upon the study, it is estimated 6,174 full-time equivalent
jobs - 71 percent in retail and the more widely distributed, are
generated by the Back to School Sales Tax Holiday.
• It can also be estimated that an additional $177 million
in wages were paid during Georgia's Back to School Sales Tax Holiday.
• And lastly, it appears that there is a net increase of $33
million in taxes collected due to increased economic activity.
There is an increase in economic activity due to the stimulating
nature of the Back to School Sales Tax Holiday. While the effect
is temporary, it does mean more temporary jobs and more overtime
for existing employees. However, the result is that there is an
additional period of spending on goods and services that continues
as a halo effect for the following months.
The Back to School Sales Tax Holiday directly increases sales of
items that remain taxable by significantly increasing traffic to
retail establishments, and indirectly, because labor income is increased
by $199 million, a large portion of which is, in turn, spent generating
additional sales taxes.
These numbers are best estimates. While Florida's sales tax holiday
lasted ten days, the limits for clothing were $50, not $100 like
Georgia. The benefits for Georgia may well be understated.
The link for the complete study can be found on the Georgia Retail
Association's website. The link is: http://www.georgiaretail.org/documents/BacktoSchoolSalesTaxHolidayOct20.pdf
Vendor's Allowance for Collecting Sales Taxes
During the First Session of the 2009-2010 Term of Georgia General
Assembly, it was suggested by some to do away with the vendor allowance
- that fee that retailers are allowed to retain for collecting and
remitting sales tax revenue to the state. In Georgia that amount
is 3% of the first $3,000 collected and .5% thereafter.
Georgia has a 4% state sales tax rate. Counties may impose local
sales tax of 1%, 2%, or 3%, consisting of up to three 1% local-option
sales taxes as permitted by Georgia law. These include a SPLOST,
a homestead exemption (HOST), and one for public schools which can
be put forth for a referendum by the school board instead of the
county commission (in cooperation with its city councils). Also,
the city of Atlanta imposes an additional 1% municipal-option sales
tax (MOST), as allowed by special legislation of the Georgia General
Assembly, solely for the purpose of fixing its water and sewerage
systems.
The state retains the 4% portion of the state sales tax revenue
and remits to the counties the local MOST, SPLOST or ESPLOST local
sales taxes. For collecting that money the Department of Revenue
(DOR) charges the counties a 1% fee. The Department of Revenue collects
much more from the counties for processing their share of sales
tax receipts than it pays to retailers. As can be seen from the
following chart, it costs retailers much more money to process sales
tax receipts than they can recoup and the Department of Revenue
earns an enormous amount of money for paying the counties their
share.
Retailers' Costs, State's Income From Sales Tax Collection
Fees
Costs of Preparation and Vendor's Allowance (in dollars)
| Sales
Tax Due |
Vendor
Allowance |
Cost
to Vendor |
Difference |
Paid
by Counties to State |
3,000.00 |
90.00 |
92.70 |
(2.70) |
30.00
|
|
5,000.00 |
100.00 |
154.50 |
(54.50) |
50.00
|
| 10,000.00 |
125.00 |
309.00 |
(184.00) |
100.00
|
| 15,000.00
|
150.00
|
463.50
|
(313.50) |
150.00
|
| 25,000.00 |
215.00 |
772.50
|
(557.50)
|
250.00
|
| 50,000.00 |
325.00 |
1,545.00
|
(1,220.00)
|
500.00
|
| 75,000.00 |
450.00 |
2,317.50
|
(1,867.50) |
750.00
|
| 100,000.00 |
675.00 |
3,090.00
|
(2,415.00)
|
1,000.00
|
| 150,000.00 |
825.00 |
4,635.00
|
(3,810.00)
|
1,500.00
|
| 200,000.00 |
1,075.00 |
6,180.00
|
(5,105.00) |
2,000.00
|
| 500,000.00 |
2,575.00 |
15,450.00
|
(12,875.00)
|
5,000.00 |
| 750,000.00 |
3,840.00 |
23,175.00
|
(19,335.00) |
7,500.00 |
| 1,000,000.00 |
5,075.00 |
30,900.00
|
(25,825.00)
|
10,000.00 |
| 9,752,210,000.00 |
48,761,125.00 |
301,343,289.00
|
(252,582,164.00)
|
97,522,100.00
|
The cost to the vendor is based on a national average cost of 3.09%
Streamline Sales Tax
Streamline Sales Tax (Main Street Fairness Act)
The battle for the shrinking American budget is moving online with
a vengeance.
The economic downturn took its toll on traditional retail outlets
over the past couple of years, and the recession which has taken
its toll on shopping centers, strip malls and mom and pop stores
across the state, has left the Internet poised to enter 2010 as
a larger force in retail.
Frugal shoppers are turning to the Internet in droves to compare
prices, hunt for bargains, download coupons and seek advice from
fellow shoppers. Retailers, weary from years of building sprees,
are diverting capital away from storefronts and to Web sites, investing
in the technology to make online shopping easier, faster and cheaper.
Online sales, excluding travel, had been growing at a roughly 20
percent to 25 percent annual clip for much of the decade, before
slowing to a 6 percent gain in 2008.
There was a time when big brick-and-mortar retailers looked askance
at their online divisions, figuring stores should receive most of
the company's resources and attention because they generate the
bulk of the sales. No longer, traditional chain stores are starting
to recognize what Amazon long has known: The benefit of an online
store reaches far beyond the dollars generated by selling merchandise.
What this means for Georgia is that the income taxes and sales taxes
that have been traditional paid by brick and mortar retailers is
starting to evaporate at an alarming pace.
Currently, as you know, Georgia's retailers collect more than $4
billion each year in sales taxes - nearly one-third of the state's
entire annual budget. However, with more and more consumer purchases
being made through the Internet Georgia's retailers are suffering
and Georgia is losing significant sales tax revenue.
In past years the House Ways and Means Committee has heard from
Dr. David Sjoquist, of Georgia State University, who testified that
Georgia lost $375 million (or 3.5% of sales tax collections) in
revenue from e-commerce in 2004. Another source - a study performed
by the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University
of Tennessee estimated Georgia's losses at $675 million from internet
sales in 2003. Regardless of which number you choose, the loss of
revenue due to the State of Georgia is significant.
The Georgia Retail Association endorses Georgia's entry as a Participating
State because it supports a level playing field for all sellers
in this state. A survey of our membership indicated an 89% support
for equal application of sales and use tax collection requirements
for remote sellers with no physical presence in the state and Georgia's
main street merchants.
Many, if not most, online, remote sellers have no investment in
the state yet are receiving the benefit of not having to charge
their online customers sales tax. In fact, it is becoming more and
more common to hear these "e-tailers" advertise "no
sales tax" as a way of promoting purchases on their sites.
Consumers who shop over the Internet or across state lines often
cite the 'tax free' benefit of these purchases. Catalog shoppers
also may believe bypassing local merchants eliminates the sales
tax and therefore reduces their costs by 5, 6 or even 7 percent.
The truth is, while an out-of-state retailer may not be required
to collect sales tax, the consumer is required to report these out-of-state
untaxed purchases to the state of Georgia and pay a 'use tax' on
most of them. Simply put: If you would pay sales tax on a purchase
made in Georgia, you should pay the tax on the same item if it was
purchased from outside of Georgia.
The fact is that mounting revenue losses will result in Georgians
paying more in other forms of taxation to compensate for these losses
or facing continued cuts in state programs. In good economic times,
the impact may not be felt as dramatically as it is now. However,
with times being as tough as they are - now is the time to act.
E-commerce is here to stay, changing the way we live and work. It
has become an economic juggernaut and it is making many people wealthy.
E-commerce and the Internet are no longer fledgling industries in
need of being propped up at the expense of existing local businesses.
You know, as I do, that simply requiring remote sellers to collect
and remit sales tax - whatever the mechanism eventually established
for doing so - will not stifle e-commerce.
The Streamlined Sales Tax Project, or as it currently called - the
Main Street Fairness Act, doesn't attempt to dictate the mechanics
for achieving tax parity - that process will be extremely complex,
and Georgia should be at the table to work out those details. The
Participating States are just saying that when a collection system
is developed, the retail establishments in their states will receive
fair treatment - Georgia's elected representatives should support
that fair treatment for Georgia's retailers as well.
Sunday Sale of Alcohol
As Georgia's grocery stores struggle to keep their doors open they
are faced with the fact that state laws preclude them from fully
selling their products. For Georgia is one
of only three states in the country that does not provide some option
for the off-premises sale of beer, wine or liquor on Sunday.
A reasonable approach to this issue is to adopt Sunday sales legislation
which allows local communities to decide whether local retailers
should have the ability to sell alcohol on Sunday. Georgians were
empowered to make this decision for local restaurants 10 years ago.
For many Georgians, the current law defies common sense. The State
allows them to
drive to a restaurant or sports facility on Sunday to buy and consume
alcohol, but the
State will not allow them to go to a grocery store and buy alcohol
to consume in the safety of their own homes.
Because of this double-standard arguments about highway safety ring
hollow and appear to be so much hyperbole.
To complicate this issue, shopping patterns have changed in Georgia.
Sunday is now the highest volume shopping day in many areas throughout
Georgia. Yet customers who enter a retail store on Sunday are prohibited
from purchasing beer to enjoy while watching football or a bottle
of wine for dinner. And stores are forced to shut down a significant
portion of their operations on the day when traffic is high.
Because Georgia is the only state in the Southeast with a total
ban on Sunday sales, we are at a distinct disadvantage. Until current
law is changed, Georgia will continue to lose revenue to across-the-border
competitors in every surrounding state.
For retailers throughout Georgia, the opportunity for off-premise
Sunday sales is about good customer service and basic economic fairness.
For More Information Contact:
johnh@georgiaretail.org
Telephone – 678-814-4176
Toll Free - 678-523-1765
Fax – 678-814-4178
www.georgiaretail.org
About GRA: The Georgia Retail Association, with
membership that comprises all retail formats and channels of distribution
including department, specialty, discount, catalog, Internet, independent
stores, and grocery stores has been serving the state’s business
community since 1961. The Georgia Retail Association represents
an industry with more than 71,300 retail establishments, and more
than 715,000 employees - about one in five of Georgia’s workers
– with annual sales of more than $115 billion.
John C. Heavener
Georgia Retail Association
Printer
Friendly CRR January 11, 2010 Special Edition
|