|
June
5 , 2009

GRA RECOGNIZES LEGISLATORS
GOING OUT OF BUSINESS SALES BECOME AN ISSUE IN GEORGIA
RECESSION HIT STATE HARDER
GRA CAPITOL HILL ADVOCACY
• Bill Requiring Visa/MasterCard to Negotiate Hidden Credit
Card Fees
• President Obama Signs Credit Card Reform Legislation Into
Law
HAPPY 35TH BIRTHDAY BAR CODE
QUOTE TO PONDER
GRA Recognizes Legislators
On Monday, June 1, 2009 the Georgia Retail Association, at its annual
conference, named Representative Tom Graves as its 2009 Representative
of the Year, and Senator Chip Rogers as its 2009 Senator of the
Year.
Tom Graves, a republican from Ranger, Georgia was the sponsor of
two significant pieces of legislation during the 2009 session of
the Georgia General Assembly. HB 481, the “Jobs Act of 2009”
and HB 482, the elimination of the state inventory tax, both were
designed to help the state’s businesses survive in difficult
economic times. While HB 481 was vetoed by the governor it included
a number of key provisions for the state’s retailers. One
important provision of the bill would have ended the requirement
of having merchants estimating their sales tax obligation in advance
of collections, and remitting those sales taxes before they were
ever realized. In these days of tight credit and small or negative
profits, cash flow is compromised by the existing law. Georgia is
one of the few states that have this unusual requirement.
Chip Rogers, a republican from Woodstock, Georgia was instrumental
in the passage of several key pieces of legislation during the 2009
session of the Georgia General Assembly. HB 481, the “Jobs
Act of 2009” and HB 482, the elimination of the state inventory
tax, and HB 120, the Sales Tax Holiday, were moved through the Senate
by Senator Rogers.
Going Out of Business Sales Become An Issue In Georgia
The Georgia Govenor’s Offcie of Consumer Affairs is cracking
down on retailers who mislead consumers by running seemingly endless
going-out-of-business sales.
Georgia law says such sales may not last more than 90 days, and
that at the end of that period, the store can no longer operate
that business at that location.
The agency’s administrator, Joe Doyle, said the illegal sales
“hurt ethical businesses by drawing away customers who are
responding to false promises of price reductions and time-limited
bargains.”
Recession Hit State Harder Than Most - Statistics Show
Georgia’s Economic Contraction In ‘08 Among Worst In
U.S.
The numbers released Tuesday, June 3, 2009 confirmed just what many
Georgians believe: the state took a harder-than-average hit from
the recession last year, shrinking at a more painful rate than most
of its neighbors.
While losing 3.4 percent of its jobs during 2008, Georgia’s
economy contracted 0.6 percent, among the worst performances in
the United States, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
In the Southeast, Georgia and Florida had the only shrinking economies
last year. When the housing bubble burst, both states hemorrhaged
jobs in real estate —- accountants and attorneys, as well
as brokers and builders.
Georgia shed 3.4 percent of its jobs during the year, a painful
flow that has continued into this year. But the litany of loss in
Georgia included manufacturing —- where exports were hammered
by global recession —- as well as finance and insurance.
Manufacturing employment has been declining for a decade and now
accounts for slightly less than 10 percent of the state’s
jobs. But the continued contraction accounts for nearly one-quarter
of the recession’s job loss, according to Don Sabbarese, director
of the Kennesaw State Econometrics Center.
Since slipping into recession in late 2007, Georgia’s job
loss has come proportionally faster than national average, though
data in recent weeks has spurred hope that the plunge in Georgia’s
economy has slowed.
Despite a negative fourth quarter, the U.S. economy ended the year
with 0.7 percent growth, the BEA said. In 2007, the economy expanded
2 percent.
Georgia tied with Indiana and Arizona for seventh-worst economy.
To the north, the Carolinas expanded modestly. Even next door Alabama
squeezed out growth, despite losing 2.9 percent of its jobs, last
year.
Bill Requiring Visa/MasterCard to Negotiate in Hidden Credit Card
Fees
On Thursday, June 4, 2009 H.R. 2695, the Credit Card Fair Fee Act
of 2009 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives. The
legislation, if enacted, would require Visa and MasterCard to negotiate
over hidden credit card processing fees that cost the average household
more than $400 a year.
The bill, sponsored by House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers,
a Democrat from Michigan, would require Visa and MasterCard banks
to negotiate with merchants on “interchange” fees that
are currently imposed on merchants on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.
Interchange is a fee averaging close to 2 percent that Visa and
MasterCard banks charge merchants every time a credit card is used
to pay for a transaction. Visa and MasterCard effectively force
merchants to pass the fees on to consumers by requiring them to
be included in the advertised price of merchandise and making cash
discounts difficult. Interchange is largely unknown to most consumers
because Visa and MasterCard keep merchants from disclosing it on
receipts and don’t disclose the fees on consumers’ monthly
statements.
Interchange collections totaled $48 billion in 2008, up from $16.6
billion in 2001. The higher prices that result from the fees cost
the average household an estimated $427 last year, up from $159
in 2001.
Please contact members of Georgia’s Congressional delegation
to urge their support of H.R. 2695.
President Obama Signs Credit Card Reform Legislation
Into Law
On May 22, President Obama signed into law the Credit
Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009,
legislation that reforms credit card practices and which passed
the House of Representatives by a margin of 361-64 one day after
the Senate passed the legislation by a vote of 90-5. The new law
codifies much of what was included in Federal Reserve’s Regulation
Z, which incorporated a number of recommendations made by RILA and
our member companies to the Federal Reserve. The legislation will
become effective nine months after enactment.
Key Provisions of Legislation
Some key provisions of the legislation include: a prohibition on
arbitrary interest rate increases and universal default on existing
balances; a requirement that promotional (or “teaser”)
rates to last at least six months; a requirement that payments made
in excess of the minimum to be applied first to the credit card
balance with the highest rate of interest; a prohibition on interest
charges on debt paid on time (also known as “double-cycle
billing” ban); a requirement that cardholders be given 45
days notice of interest rate, fee and finance charge increases;
a requirement that issuers disclose the period of time and total
interest it will take to pay off the card balance if only minimum
monthly payments are made; and increases existing penalties for
companies that violate the Truth in Lending Act for credit card
customers.
Gift Cards
Title IV of the bill places new restrictions on expiration dates
and fees associated with gift certificates, store gift cards, and
general-use prepaid cards. The gift card provisions become effective
15 months after the bill’s enactment.
Specifically, the provision states that it is prohibited to charge
a “dormancy fee, an inactivity charge or fee, or a service
fee with respect to a gift certificate, store gift card, or general-use
prepaid card” UNLESS the card has been dormant for at least
one year and no more than one fee is charged per month. Such fees
may only be charged if certain disclosure requirements, as prescribed
in the legislation, are met. In addition, the bill prohibits the
issuance of gift certificates, store gift cards, or general-use
prepaid cards that have expiration dates unless they are at least
five years after the gift certificate was issued, or the date on
which card funds were last loaded to a store gift card or general-use
prepaid cards.
Interchange Rate Study
As originally drafted, a proposed amendment to the bill would have
allowed retailers to offer discounts for cash, check and debit transactions
by prohibiting banks and credit card networks from imposing restrictions
and fines on retailers. The amendment would have also allowed retailers
to steer customers or offer discounts for using low-fee cards versus
high-fee cards. Finally, the amendment would have directed the Federal
Reserve to collect information on interchange rates every two years
and publish and make available that information to the public.
After some back and forth between the amendment sponsors and bill
negotiators, the amendment was paired back somewhat by removing
the Federal Reserve study as well as the ability to offer discounts
for certain credit cards.
Consumer groups for the first time went on record supporting legislative
action on interchange fees. The Consumer Federation of America,
the Consumers Union, the National Consumer Law Center and U.S. Public
Interest Research Group wrote a letter to the entire Senate asking
senators to support the Durbin-Bond amendment. The letter discusses
in detail how high interchange rates are passed along to consumers,
and advocates for allowing retailers to provide discounts for debit
or cash payments. However, the letter also stipulates that “in
order to ensure that consumers actually benefit from this proposal,
it is important that Congress and the GAO closely monitor whether
and how much of the savings that merchants receive from the debit
card usage are passed through to the consumers in the form of discounts
and lower prices.”
Notwithstanding the fact that the Durbin-Bond amendment was not
agreed to, the underlying bill contains a provision (Sec. 501) directing
the Government Accountability Office to “conduct a study on
use of credit by consumers, interchange fees, and their effects
on consumers and merchants” and report back to Congress within
180 days of the bill’s enactment on its findings. That report
will now be due back to Congress sometime around December of this
year.
Happy 35th Birthday Bar Code
The humble bar code turns 35 this week. A collection of black stripes
on merchandise sold over retail counters has changed the world.
The most obvious benefit of bar coding is that consumers need to
spend less time at check-out counters, waiting for their bills to
be manually prepared. These days, it takes a few swipes over a bar
code reader to do the trick.
Bar coding has helped retailers and manufacturers keep a close eye
on sale patterns in real time, knowing exactly when to stock up
or run down inventory. That has led to a radically new world of
efficient supply chains and tight inventory management. Businesses
have become more flexible.
QUOTE TO PONDER
“Today, … it cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution
is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals –
that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only
the conduct of the government – that it is not a charter for
government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against
the government.” Ayn Rand
Thank you,
John C. Heavener, MSM, CAE
President, Georgia Retail Association
For More Information Contact:
johnh@georgiaretail.org
Telephone – 770-484-3449, ext. 21
Toll Free - (877) 427-3824
Fax – 770-484-5727
www.georgiaretail.org
About GRA: The Georgia Retail Association, with
membership that comprises all retail formats and channels of distribution
including department, specialty, discount, catalog, Internet, independent
stores, and grocery stores has been serving the state’s business
community since 1961. The Georgia Retail Association represents
an industry with more than 71,300 retail establishments, and more
than 715,000 employees - about one in five of Georgia’s workers
– with annual sales of more than $115 billion.
Printer
Friendly CRR June 5, 2009
|